Editorial Product Review: :The difference between duck breast and succulent 'Magret' goes beyond definition. Magret refers to the breasts of ducks that have been fed and raised to produce foie gras. The result? A generously large, tender and leaner meat than regular duck. You'll find that this fresh Magret is reminiscent of a red meat than a blander poultry meat. Made to be prepared tenderly, flash-frozen to preserve the integrity of the flavor and give you the most authentically delicious ...
Editorial Product Review: :Palacios was the first authentic Spanish chorizo available in the United States. Most other chorizos, good as they are, are made in the USA with Spanish ingredients. Palacios mild chorizo is made from a generations-old recipe by a family owned company in La Rioja. It was featured in the New York Times and Wine Spectator® magazine. This 5- pack gives you plenty of mild delicious pork sausage for a party or family gathering It is seasoned with ...
Editorial Product Review: :The Moulard duck is a hybrid cross of female Pekin and a male Muscovy duck. The Moulard duck is corn fed several times daily in the three weeks before processing. The Moulard breast, called magnet, is aged seven days on the bone to provide a red, meaty flesh. It is so big that some call it a duck steak. Magret breast should be prepared as any red meat; seared and roasted, grilled or sautéed. Outer skin should ...
We've covered in too much detail how it's some sort of "open season" on Vonage when it comes to VoIP patents. After dealing with ridiculous and expensive patent lawsuits from companies who failed to actually innovate in the same way Vonage did, the company was pressured by Wall Street to quickly settle the various patent lawsuits filed against the company. Of course, rather than settle matters, that simply opened the door for other companies to go searching through their patent portfolios to see if there was anything they could sue Vonage over. Indeed, following those settlements it didn't take long for AT&T to dig up a patent and sue -- which was quickly settled as well. Thought things were over? No such luck. Nortel just showed up last month to sue and it took all of about a week and a half for Vonage to settle that case as well.
The Nortel case is slightly different because Vonage actually already had a patent infringement lawsuit going against Nortel, but it wasn't really initiated by Vonage. Instead, it had been initiated by a patent holding firm that Vonage bought in 2006. The end result of the settlement doesn't involve money changing hands, but just a cross licensing agreement for the patents. So what's the big lesson that Vonage and others have learned from this? It's certainly got nothing to do with innovating. It's to hoard as many patents as possible so that you have your own nuclear stockpile for when someone else sues you. Want to know why the USPTO is overwhelmed? It's not because there aren't enough examiners (as some will claim) or that there aren't enough funds. It's because the way the system now works is that you are supposed to file patents on every tiny little advancement so you can use it to protect yourself against lawsuits from everyone else. That's not about innovation. It's about waste. In the meantime, since it's still open season at Vonage, who's going to be next? There are a ton of other patents in the VoIP space that can surely be used in a lawsuit, right?
Small and light enough for a shirt pocket, Samsung's Helix YX-M1 is a one-stop audio entertainment center with an XM radio, a digital music player, and room for 50 hours of tunes, but it comes up short on battery life.
This raw work-flow application isn't the Holy Grail many hoped it would be, but Apple Aperture 1.5 could make life easier for photographers who need to cull, retouch, and output large numbers of photographs quickly and efficiently.